Monday, July 26, 2010

Wikileaks Strikes again.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/26/world/asia/26warlogs.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

They've released thousands of classified reports from Afghanistan dating back to 2004. Much like the McCrystal article, they paint a terrible picture of war gone wrong. For Example:

"MARCH 5, 2007 | GHAZNI PROVINCE
Incident Report: Checkpoint Danger

Afghan police officers shot a local driver who tried to speed through their checkpoint on a country road in Ghazni Province south of Kabul. The police had set up a temporary checkpoint on the highway just outside the main town in the district of Ab Band.

“A car approached the check point at a high rate of speed,” the report said. All the police officers fled the checkpoint except one. As the car passed the checkpoint it knocked down the lone policeman. He fired at the vehicle, apparently thinking that it was a suicide car bomber.

“The driver of the vehicle was killed,” the report said. “No IED [improved explosive device] was found and vehicle was destroyed.”

The police officer was detained in the provincial capital, Ghazni, and questioned. He was then released. The American mentoring the police concluded in his assessment that the policeman’s use of force was appropriate. Rather than acknowledging the public hostility such episodes often engender, the report found a benefit: it suggested that the shooting would make Afghans take greater care at checkpoints in the future.

“Effects on the populace clearly identify the importance of stopping at checkpoints,” the report concluded."

Here's the document.


Our wars look more like a Joseph Conrad novel every day.

1 comment:

  1. Haha. The Wikileaks website itself has been more or less idle for about four months, I read.

    Andrew Bacevich from The New Republic (and others) are now starting to ask more emphatically than ever:

    What exactly is the point of the Afghanistan war? The point cannot be to "prevent another 9/11," since violent anti-Western jihadists are by no means confined to or even concentrated in Afghanistan. Even if we were to "win" in Afghanistan tomorrow, the jihadist threat would persist. If anything, staying in Afghanistan probably exacerbates that threat. So tell me again: why exactly are we there?

    ReplyDelete